Abdulrahman al-Masri covers politics and news in the Middle East and Syria in particular. He can be followed on Twitter: @AbdulrhmanMasri

  • Jordan must rethink its approach to reopening Syria border crossing, On: Sun, 15 Oct 2017

  • Turkey’s calculus in Idlib, On: Sun, 01 Oct 2017

  • Is it too late for the Syrian opposition to unify armed rebels?, On: Sun, 17 Sep 2017

  • What is behind the Syrian regime’s push south-west of Raqqa?, On: Sun, 20 Aug 2017

  • Is Syria safe enough for refugees to return home?, On: Sun, 13 Aug 2017

  • Trump ending support to Syrian opposition may be short-sighted, On: Sun, 30 Jul 2017

  • Documentary explores Arab-Canadian barbershop culture, On: Sun, 02 Jul 2017

  • Jordan’s increased involvement in Syria, On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017

  • Calling Iran’s Rohani a ‘moderate’ is a misnomer, On: Sun, 28 May 2017

  • Changes expected to Canada’s anti-ISIS mission, On: Sun, 21 May 2017

  • Can the US pressure Russia to relinquish Assad? , On: Sun, 23 Apr 2017

  • Amman must bolster ties with Syrian rebels, On: Sun, 19 Mar 2017

  • Canada Muslims weather fallout after deadly attack , On: Sun, 12 Feb 2017

  • Turkey introduces a softer Russia to the Syrian opposition, On: Sun, 22 Jan 2017

  • Donald Trump is not good news for Syrian revolutionaries , On: Sun, 20 Nov 2016

  • Challenges surround the anti-ISIS Raqqa operation , On: Sun, 13 Nov 2016

  • What does al-Rai incident say about US reputation in Syria? , On: Sun, 02 Oct 2016

  • Jabhat Fateh al-Sham dominates Aleppo rebels despite losing senior commander , On: Sun, 18 Sep 2016

  • Civilians, rebels leave long-besieged Daraya , On: Sun, 04 Sep 2016

  • Al-Nusra is playing realpolitik, On: Sun, 07 Aug 2016

  • Turkish Army boosts border security with Syria, On: Sun, 03 Jul 2016

  • US Centcom commander visits Syria’s north-east , On: Sun, 29 May 2016

  • Ankara and Washington walk separate paths on Kurdish issue , On: Sun, 15 May 2016

  • What does Canada’s refocused mission against ISIS have to offer?, On: Fri, 25 Mar 2016

  • Partitioning Syria is not the answer , On: Fri, 25 Mar 2016

  • US envoy in Syria to prop up Kurdish-Arab alliance , On: Fri, 12 Feb 2016

  • Canada welcomes Syrian refugees to their new home, On: Fri, 22 Jan 2016

  • Syrian opposition sees little hope in Geneva peace talks , On: Fri, 22 Jan 2016

  • Kurdish-Arab coalition emerging as ground force v ISIS , On: Fri, 27 Nov 2015

  • What does Canada’s new Liberal government mean to the Middle East?, On: Fri, 30 Oct 2015

  • Niqab debate at the heart of Canada’s election campaign, On: Fri, 16 Oct 2015

  • Canadian parties clash over Syrian refugee crisis , On: Fri, 11 Sep 2015

  • Campaign buys ISIS slaves’ freedom but may spur more kidnapping, critics say, On: Fri, 28 Aug 2015

  • Moscow pushes Syria talks to promote its agenda , On: Fri, 21 Aug 2015

  • US-backed secular force off to a slow start in Syria , On: Fri, 14 Aug 2015

  • Jordan must rethink its approach to reopening Syria border crossing


    2017/10/15 Issue: 127 Page: 13



    Authorities in Am­man are pressuring southern Syria rebels to hand over control of the major border crossing between Syr­ia and Jordan, which they captured in April 2015, to the Damascus re­gime. Since Russia and the United States brokered a “de-escalation zone” agreement for south-western Syria, President Bashar Assad’s administration has increasingly pushed for the reopening of the Nasib Border Crossing with Jordan.

    Along with trade perks, the As­sad regime would receive a boost of legitimacy if it came to control the border crossing, as Jordan and others seem to seek better rela­tions with a re-emerging regime in Damascus. However, while Jordan may also benefit economically from the reopening of the cross­ing, which used to be a major trade transit route between Gulf coun­tries and Turkey, it risks destabilis­ing its northern frontier.

    Over the last five years, Amman has been able to unobtrusively maintain a relative semblance of security and stability along its 375km border with Syria but the recent push by authorities in Am­man to reopen the Nasib Border Crossing in cooperation with the Assad regime hints at a short-sight­ed approach that would jeopardise the stability of a strategic region in Syria.

    Until this point, nationalist-orientated rebels in southern Syria have resisted pressure. Opposition forces in the south reject the re­gime control of the border crossing for two main reasons: They view it to be a mean that aims at reha­bilitating an illegitimate regime in Damascus and they fear losing local public support, albeit they could stand to profit from a portion of the customs fees if they end up agreeing to regime and Jordanian proposals.

    There were reports that Jordan is firm about reopening the crossing point, whether or not the rebels agree. In this respect, Jordan seems to misperceive the Assad regime’s long-term objectives for the region and the history of southern Syria’s rebellion and population, who was first to ignite the uprising in 2011.

    Steady backing from Russia and Iran to the Assad regime made a regime change scenario in Syria no longer conceivable. The Assad regime’s overall goal, however, is to eventually control all of Syria. While this appears to contradict realities of the conflict, regime ac­tions across Syria can only suggest such a mentality.

    Assad’s regime is no longer that of pre-2011, however. His forces are almost entirely dependent on foreign fighters and lack indig­enous Syrian manpower. Assad does not view de-escalation agree­ments as means for stability and de-confliction to pave a way to meaningful peace talks but rather as reconciliation agreements meant to eventually lead rebels to submit to his rule.

    If the Syrian regime is to take control of the south again, the bor­der region would face instability given the geostrategic importance of the area to Iran and its sectarian proxies. Amman fears the possibil­ity of sectarian tensions over its northern border, which would put Jordan’s national security interests and those of its allies — Gulf coun­tries, the United States and Israel — in substantial vulnerability.

    Increasing Assad’s presence in the south, even if only in the bor­der crossing area, would feed into the narrative of extremists and in­crease their recruitment potential among the local population, which largely opposes the regime.

    Amman must acknowledge that stability in southern Syria can only be achieved with an opposition, na­tionalist-oriented force composed of fighters from the region itself, thus mirroring the aspirations and demographic composition of the south-western population.

    While jihadist forces do exist in southern Syria, including an Is­lamic State (ISIS) affiliate, they are outweighed by nationalist-oriented rebels who are indigenous to the region.

    Among opposition forces in Syria, rebels in Daraa are the most moderate. The Southern Front coalition, for instance, includes ap­proximately 40 Free Syrian Army-linked factions that have proved to be reliable for the region’s security and flexible to work with regional powers. Unlike other rebel groups, the Southern Front operates, to a large extent, realistically and holds no direct interest in attacking regime-held Damascus.

    Given the level of complexity, the conflict has reached and the territorial disintegration among regions across Syria, rebels in the south may want to become a force localised for the security of opposition-held areas — a force that would conduct operations against extremist groups and secure real long-term stability and de-confliction.

    Amman must not appease the Southern Front nor work against its agenda. Instead, the kingdom, with support from regional powers and the United States, could em­power and build an effective part­nership with the Southern Front, which could serve as a model of an acceptable and nationalist-ori­ented security force essential for the future of Syria and stability in its south. The Southern Front can prioritise countering jihadists and preserving stability, as it shares Jordan’s view that the war in Syria can only be concluded with a po­litical settlement.

    For the sake of long-term stabil­ity, Jordan must clearly pronounce its opposition to any expansion of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-funded and -mobilised forces along its northern border and demand the Russians to exert any influence they bear on their al­lies in Syria, particularly Hezbollah and the Iranians. The de-escala­tion zone agreement would show success only when extremists on all sides are being targeted and when local-led stability efforts are enabled.

    Security challenges to Jordan from next door are real. Amman must not prioritise economic ben­efits over border security. Jordan must also not be fooled by recent regime advances and think that the regime is winning the war. Centralised Syria is no longer pos­sible. If Jordan looks to secure its northern border for the long run and counter extremists in south­ern Syria, Amman must prioritise restoring its partnership with lo­cal, nationalist-oriented rebels.

    Editors' Picks

    The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

    From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

    Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

    Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

    Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

    Senior Editor: John Hendel

    Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

    Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

    Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

    East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

    Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

    Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

    Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

    Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

    Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

    Regular Columnists

    Claude Salhani

    Yavuz Baydar

    Correspondents

    Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

    Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

    Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

    Thomas Seibert (Washington)

    Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi

    Designers

    Ibrahim Ben Bechir

    Hanen Jebali

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

    Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

    Tel 020 3667 7249

    Mohamed Al Mufti

    Marketing & Advertising Manager

    Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

    Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

    www.alarab.co.uk

    Al Arab Publishing House

    Kensington Centre

    177-179 Hammersmith Road

    London W6 8BS , UK

    Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

    Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

    Follow Us
    © The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved