Yavuz Baydar is a journalist based in Istanbul. A founding member of the Platform for Independent Journalism (P24) and a news analyst, he won the European Press Prize in 2014. He has been reporting on Turkey and journalism issues since 1980.

  • One year after the coup attempt: Turkey hijacked, On: Sun, 16 Jul 2017

  • Turkey’s disarray continues to unravel, On: Sun, 09 Jul 2017

  • Erdogan raises stakes with NATO but to no avail, On: Sun, 02 Jul 2017

  • Did Erdogan foresee a coup? The opposition says ‘yes’, On: Sun, 25 Jun 2017

  • Qatari crisis, Turkish paralysis , On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017

  • Qatar’s isolation deepens Turkey’s ‘regional solitude’, On: Sun, 11 Jun 2017

  • More empowered, Erdogan to test patience of Turkish society, On: Sun, 04 Jun 2017

  • Much ado about one thing, On: Sun, 21 May 2017

  • A game changer to unveil known unknowns, On: Sun, 14 May 2017

  • Turkey’s purge takes a heavy toll, On: Sun, 07 May 2017

  • Ankara risks a downgrade to transactional partnership with the West, On: Sun, 30 Apr 2017

  • Erdogan’s win, Turkey’s loss , On: Sun, 23 Apr 2017

  • Post-referendum Turkey is bound to see its relations redefined, On: Sun, 16 Apr 2017

  • Voting on the referendum: Turkey’s last curve, On: Sun, 09 Apr 2017

  • What will it take for Erdogan to accept Kurdish reality?, On: Sun, 02 Apr 2017

  • Turkey’s relations with NATO in jeopardy, On: Sun, 26 Mar 2017

  • Turks in Europe are victims of Erdogan’s policies, On: Sun, 19 Mar 2017

  • Manbij could mark collapse of Turkey’s Syria policy, On: Sun, 12 Mar 2017

  • The world according to Erdogan, On: Sun, 05 Mar 2017

  • Turkish-Iranian feud part of Ankara balancing act, On: Sun, 26 Feb 2017

  • Reviving a crisis kept frozen, On: Sun, 12 Feb 2017

  • Bells are ringing for Turkey’s moment of decision, On: Sun, 05 Feb 2017

  • Turkish educational system: Darwin out, jihad in, On: Sun, 29 Jan 2017

  • Why Erdogan is an ideal counterpart for Europe, On: Sun, 22 Jan 2017

  • Rushing Turkey headlong into a political abyss, On: Sun, 15 Jan 2017

  • Turkey’s security deficit invites further harm and instability , On: Sun, 08 Jan 2017

  • Erdogan’s brinksmanship, On: Sun, 25 Dec 2016

  • Stripped of Neo-Ottomanist dreams, Erdogan ties his hopes to Trump, On: Sun, 18 Dec 2016

  • ‘It will get worse, before it gets better’, On: Sun, 04 Dec 2016

  • Turkish crisis deepens with economic woes, On: Sun, 27 Nov 2016

  • Erdogan hopes for a new negotiation process with Trump , On: Sun, 13 Nov 2016

  • Erdogan is closing in on vision of one-man rule, On: Sun, 06 Nov 2016

  • What drives Erdogan?, On: Sun, 30 Oct 2016

  • Questions linger after Turkey’s attempted coup, On: Sun, 23 Oct 2016

  • Mosul is a ticking bomb, but against whom? , On: Sun, 16 Oct 2016

  • Rocking the boat, On: Sun, 09 Oct 2016

  • Happiness for Syrian refugee may be a debit card, On: Sun, 02 Oct 2016

  • Syrian Kurds’ delicate balancing act, On: Sun, 25 Sep 2016

  • Can Turkey find a way out of its impasse? , On: Sun, 18 Sep 2016

  • One year after the coup attempt: Turkey hijacked

    Turkey’s crisis will be long-lasting, because Erdogan’s opponents will not let go quietly.


    2017/07/16 Issue: 115 Page: 14



    More than a year after a patchy mili­tary uprising, Turkey is entan­gled in its deepest systemic crisis ever. The coup attempt that began about 10pm on July 15, 2016, was an amateurish move to topple the elected government but seemingly an act of collective suicide. The institution that secular Turks had for long seen as the guarantor of its safety — the army — joined the fray.

    The state and the rule of law were vulnerable to undemocratic interventions and the coup attempt exposed how divided, fragile and inefficient the disar­rayed opposition was. No wonder that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the day after, called it “God’s gift” and set out on an unchallengeable effort to transform Turkey into a republic whose course and fate are tied to his words and moods.

    It was really a freak uprising about which all the key questions have been repeatedly asked without any convincing answers or proof provided. Almost every­thing about the build-up, back­ground and choreography of the coup attempt remains a mystery.

    The information available is limited. It helps understand that the attempt was reported by an officer in the national intelligence service (MIT) at 2.30pm July 15, 2016, but the rest is blurred. The chief of staff was alarmed but the top general, Hulusi Akar, did not react properly. Neither he nor the director of MIT, Hakan Fidan, seemed to reach Erdogan, Prime Minister Binali Yildirim or members of the cabinet.

    They were acting as everything was normal that night. Contacted at the weddings they were attending they were told no one had any idea about what was happening, though Akar was aware of what was going on.

    The uprising was disorganised and doomed to fail. It was, as it were, designed to end so. Official data stated that only 1.5% of the army took part in the attempt. The reaction of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) also seemed suspicious. It took a very short time to organise people on the streets, to alert AKP munici­palities to set in motion trucks to block the tanks and the mosques to broadcast prayers to call for resistance.

    While the shackled media had only the official version to report, unable to investigate shady corners of the story, the only hope was that a parliamentary commis­sion would scrutinise the ques­tions that remained unanswered. It turned out to be a farce. Its chairman had fooled the opposi­tion, it was revealed later, by failing to call four key witnesses of the night for testimony. Neither Erdogan, nor Yildirim, nor Fidan, nor Akar appeared.

    After a bumpy start, it took only days to disband the commission after Erdogan unlawfully declared it had done its job and the report it was expected to produce was declared null and void by the two opposition parties, the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the People’s Democratic Party (HDP), which published dissenting reports. Both called the uprising a move to seize control because it would be crucial for Erdogan to launch his counter-coup.

    Several fiercely pro-Erdogan pundits called it a “hybrid coup,” involving pro-NATO officers, those loyal to the secular ideals of the founder of the Republic of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, and followers of US-based Turkish Islamist preacher Fethullah Gulen. Two pundits wrote that they had been told by the prominent politicians of the AKP in Ankara days after the uprising that the coup attempt was the work of various commanders but for the sake of national unity the entire blame would be put on a group that is an object of hate in Turkey — the Gulenists.

    Nobody questioned who had truly pushed the buttons and joined in wholeheartedly. To this day, none of the observers of Turkey with sound reason deny that Gulenists were behind the coup to a large extent but nobody can demonstrate with proof who led whom that night.

    After the failed coup, an unprecedented witch-hunt was launched in public service, academia, media, the security apparatus and the army. About 160,000 people were fired from their jobs, 50,000 were arrested, 160 journalists imprisoned and academia was cleansed.

    It is symbolic that Kemal Kilicdaroglu, leader of the main opposition CHP, walked 420km from Ankara to Istanbul in a march for justice, signalling that that Turkey’s crisis will be long-lasting, because Erdogan’s opponents will not let go quietly.

    Their adversary is more powerful than ever, however. Erdogan had a head start and he is determined to maintain the best tool he has a grip on. On July 12, he said emergency rule would continue “as long as we see necessary.” In plain words, that means at least until the end of 2019, the year of presidential elections and the change to a political system of one-man rule.

    The rule of law has collapsed in Turkey and the judiciary is an extension of Erdogan’s palace. The parliament has been stripped of its powers of scrutiny and the media are probably more than 90% under the AKP’s control.

    Turkey from its allies’ and friends’ perspective is lost. The consequences will be far more costly in terms of democratic values and human dignity than ever imagined.

    Editors' Picks

    The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

    From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

    Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

    Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Dalal Saoud

    Senior Editor: John Hendel

    Chief Copy Editors: Jonathan Hemming and Richard Pretorius

    Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

    Opinion Section Editor: Claude Salhani

    East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

    Levant Section Editor: Jamal J. Halaby

    Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

    Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

    Senior Correspondents:

    Mahmud el-Shafey (London)

    Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

    Correspondents

    Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

    Dunia El-Zobeidi (London)

    Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

    Rasha Elass - Thomas Seibert (Washington)

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

    Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

    Tel 020 3667 7249

    Mohamed Al Mufti

    Marketing & Advertising Manager

    Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

    Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

    www.alarab.co.uk

    Al Arab Publishing House

    Kensington Centre

    177-179 Hammersmith Road

    London W6 8BS , UK

    Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

    Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

    Follow Us
    © The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved