Yavuz Baydar is a journalist based in Istanbul. A founding member of the Platform for Independent Journalism (P24) and a news analyst, he won the European Press Prize in 2014. He has been reporting on Turkey and journalism issues since 1980.

  • Turkey’s relations with NATO in jeopardy, On: Sun, 26 Mar 2017

  • Turks in Europe are victims of Erdogan’s policies, On: Sun, 19 Mar 2017

  • Manbij could mark collapse of Turkey’s Syria policy, On: Sun, 12 Mar 2017

  • The world according to Erdogan, On: Sun, 05 Mar 2017

  • Turkish-Iranian feud part of Ankara balancing act, On: Sun, 26 Feb 2017

  • Turkey’s Syrian problem turning into a riddle, On: Sun, 19 Feb 2017

  • Reviving a crisis kept frozen, On: Sun, 12 Feb 2017

  • Bells are ringing for Turkey’s moment of decision, On: Sun, 05 Feb 2017

  • Turkish educational system: Darwin out, jihad in, On: Sun, 29 Jan 2017

  • Why Erdogan is an ideal counterpart for Europe, On: Sun, 22 Jan 2017

  • Rushing Turkey headlong into a political abyss, On: Sun, 15 Jan 2017

  • Turkey’s security deficit invites further harm and instability , On: Sun, 08 Jan 2017

  • Erdogan’s brinksmanship, On: Sun, 25 Dec 2016

  • Stripped of Neo-Ottomanist dreams, Erdogan ties his hopes to Trump, On: Sun, 18 Dec 2016

  • ‘It will get worse, before it gets better’, On: Sun, 04 Dec 2016

  • Turkish crisis deepens with economic woes, On: Sun, 27 Nov 2016

  • Erdogan hopes for a new negotiation process with Trump , On: Sun, 13 Nov 2016

  • Erdogan is closing in on vision of one-man rule, On: Sun, 06 Nov 2016

  • What drives Erdogan?, On: Sun, 30 Oct 2016

  • Questions linger after Turkey’s attempted coup, On: Sun, 23 Oct 2016

  • Rocking the boat, On: Sun, 09 Oct 2016

  • Happiness for Syrian refugee may be a debit card, On: Sun, 02 Oct 2016

  • Syrian Kurds’ delicate balancing act, On: Sun, 25 Sep 2016

  • Can Turkey find a way out of its impasse? , On: Sun, 18 Sep 2016

  • Journalists in Turkey: An endangered species , On: Sun, 11 Sep 2016

  • Stuck in Syria: Will Turkey end up losing once more?, On: Sun, 28 Aug 2016

  • A mutually convenient ‘new page’, On: Sun, 14 Aug 2016

  • No room for illusions in Turkey’s future , On: Sun, 07 Aug 2016

  • Turkey after the coup attempt: Normalisation or deeper chaos?, On: Sun, 31 Jul 2016

  • Turkey risks being caged by AKP self-coup, On: Sun, 24 Jul 2016

  • Erdogan’s plan to naturalise Syrians proves divisive , On: Sun, 17 Jul 2016

  • Erdogan’s foreign policy ‘reset’, On: Sun, 03 Jul 2016

  • Dark days in Turkey, On: Sun, 26 Jun 2016

  • Turkey’s foreign policy setbacks, On: Sun, 19 Jun 2016

  • As its prime minister quits, Turkey nears abyss , On: Sun, 08 May 2016

  • Turkey’s relations with NATO in jeopardy

    There is a tacit understanding that Turkish-EU relations are on life support, doomed to fail.


    2017/03/26 Issue: 99 Page: 16



    The gap between Turkey and its allies within NATO has reached alarming levels, threatening a rupture with far-reaching consequences.

    More than anything, it involves the apparent and growing disagreement between Ankara and some Western capitals about the nature of the coup attempt in Turkey last July. A Der Spiegel interview with Bruno Kahl, the head of the German intelligence service, added fuel to the fire. It followed the spat between Turkey and Germany over the ban on Turkish politicians conducting rallies on German soil.

    Kahl was asked whether he believed Fethullah Gulen, a Turk­ish cleric in Pennsylvania, was behind the coup. “Turkey has tried to convince us on a number of different levels,” he said, “but they haven’t yet been success­ful.”

    “The coup attempt wasn’t staged by the state,” he went on. “Even before July 15th, the government had launched a large wave of purges. That is why elements within the military thought they should quickly launch a coup, before they, too, were purged, but it was too late and they were purged as well…

    “The consequences of the putsch that we have seen would have happened anyway, if perhaps not as deep and radical. The coup was likely just a welcome pretext.”

    Karl also asked: “Will the country remain a partner in the security alliance?”

    Almost simultaneously others across the Atlantic were making similar remarks. US Representa­tive Devin Nunes, R-California and chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, questioned the files presented by the Turkish govern­ment to the US Department of Justice alleging that Gulen was the mastermind behind the putsch.

    Interviewed on Fox TV, Nunes said: “I find it hard to believe… I saw no evidence (in there) about Gulen’s involvement in the coup.”

    “Turkey as a NATO partner has been for long a strong ally of ours but [the Turks] are becoming more and more worrisome in terms of being a reliable ally,” Nunes added.

    Such statements, more public and louder than ever, shatter the mood in Ankara. While some pro-Erdogan pundits were developing conspiracy theories, top sources of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) were accusing the intelligence structures of being used or infiltrated by Gulenists. Turkish Defence Minister Fikri Isik accused Kahl of “being ignorant of the facts”, questioning whether German Intelligence was behind the coup. “Where are you (Germany) in all this?” Isik asked.

    The gap seemed wider with warnings from the European Commission. EU Commissioner for Enlargement Johannes Hahn said in a newspaper interview that the prospect of Turkey joining the European Union becomes increasingly “unrealis­tic”. Hahn indicated that after Turkey’s April 16th referendum on presidential powers, Turkish membership negotiations could be shelved altogether — a notion that has been circulated even more loudly by the European Parliament.

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan seems not to object. Constantly talking about reinstating the death penalty should his side win the referen­dum vote does not endear him to the European Union. Nor did his saying: “Everything, including the refugee agreement, will be put on the table. It’s all over.”

    There is a tacit understanding that Turkish-EU relations are on life support, doomed to fail. However, it is clear that the NATO dimension is seen as far more crucial in defining Turkey’s future role, even its existence, in the military alliance.

    A sign of crack was seen when Süddeutsche Zeitung reported that the German government had since early 2016 rejected Turkish requests on arms sales — light weapons and ammunition — 11 times on the basis that they could be used on the civilian popula­tion, meaning Kurds and political opponents.

    There have been reports that four high-ranking Turkish officers and the military attaché in Oslo have been granted asylum in Norway. More than 150 Turkish Army members defected to Germany and Belgium. Officers from one NATO member seeking asylum and their claims being treated as legitimate in another is unprecedented, underlining the historically important dimension of the stand-off. Sources within the AKP say Germany could use the defectors and a couple top-level prosecutors and diplomats also seeking refugee status in clan­destine activities against Turkey.

    A long series of trials related to the coup attempt under way adds to the puzzle. What the suspects, especially those at the top of the command chain, tell the courts might confirm suspicions or raise new ones about who was behind the coup.

    A majority of them deny any affiliation or cooperation with Gulen and his followers, main­taining that they are Kemalists, staunchly loyal to the principles of Turkey’s founder.

    A witness statement by Zekai Aksakallı, commander of special operations forces, stirred even more suspicion. “A state of alarm within our army leads automati­cally to a top-level order on the entire staff not to leave their bases and barracks,” he said, “but this basic rule, always applied, was not implemented July 15th when the reports have been received. If that was done, the coup would be totally exposed from the first moment.”

    On March 22nd, the chargé d’affaires of the German embassy was summoned to the Turkish Foreign Ministry to be told its intelligence services’ statements were unacceptable. This rift adds to the elements that threaten Turkey’s role and trustworthi­ness in NATO and intelligence structures and in the coalition combating jihadists in Syria and Iraq.

    Editors' Picks

    The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

    From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

    Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

    Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Dalal Saoud

    Senior Editor: John Hendel

    Chief Copy Editors: Jonathan Hemming and Richard Pretorius

    Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

    Opinion Section Editor: Claude Salhani

    East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

    Levant Section Editor: Jamal J. Halaby

    Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

    Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

    Senior Correspondents:

    Mahmud el-Shafey (London)

    Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

    Correspondents

    Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

    Dunia El-Zobeidi (London)

    Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

    Rasha Elass - Thomas Seibert (Washington)

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

    Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

    Tel 020 3667 7249

    Mohamed Al Mufti

    Marketing & Advertising Manager

    Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

    Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

    www.alarab.co.uk

    Al Arab Publishing House

    Kensington Centre

    66 Hammersmith Road

    London W14 8UD, UK

    Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

    Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

    Follow Us
    © The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved