Rami Rayess is editor-in-chief of Lebanese Al Anbaa Electronic Newspaper (anbaaonline.com) and spokesman for the Progressive Socialist Party in Lebanon.

  • The recipe for chaos in Lebanon , On: Sun, 05 Mar 2017

  • Is this the new face of fascism in the West?, On: Sun, 19 Feb 2017

  • Lebanon: Will the momentum be squandered?, On: Sun, 08 Jan 2017

  • Lebanon’s state of paralysis , On: Sun, 11 Sep 2016

  • Dim prospects for electing a new Lebanese president , On: Sun, 14 Aug 2016

  • The recipe for chaos in Lebanon

    Monopolisation of sectarian politics by some leaders has given way for populism to increase.

    2017/03/05 Issue: 96 Page: 10

    “We are not merely transferring power from one adminis­tration to another, we are transferring power from Washington and giving it back to you,” words from US President Donald Trump’s inaugural speech expressing one dimension of populism that “means different things to different groups but all versions share a suspicion of and hostility towards elites, mainstream politics and established institu­tions”, as Fareed Zakaria explained in Foreign Affairs.

    Obviously, populism is on the rise in the West. Traditions of democracy and constitutional rule are at stake. Globalisation and open-border policies seem to be taking a reverse trend for the sake of protectionism, erecting walls on frontiers and measures that jeopardise decades of cooperation between countries. The with­drawal of Britain from the European Union is but one prominent example.

    The Middle East, being histori­cally the centre of conflicts, has been affected by this trend of populism. It contributed to what was known as the globalisation of rage, as Pankaj Mishra explained, considering that “today’s extrem­ism looks familiar”.

    How does such a global trend on the rise affect a small country such as Lebanon? How can a country built on intricate balance of powers, with both regional and local dimensions, provide space for populist speeches that could upset the balances?

    The unique formula of conso­ciational democracy that Lebanon developed after the Taif accord (1989) and especially after the Doha agreement (2008) has gradually descended into a collective governance system that requires unanimity on almost all decisions. The confessional structure aggravated this fragile system granting political leaders exclusive rights to veto decisions that contradict their interests in the name of the sect.

    Gradually, the right of represen­tation for the sects turned out to be the right to veto, boycott or paralyse the political and consti­tutional system. The monopolisa­tion of sectarian politics by some leaders has given way for pop­ulism to increase.

    Attempts by some groups to drag the political process towards the creation of pure confessional parliamentarian blocs in contra­diction to a diversified one shall automatically lead to the rise of populism and extremism.

    Political discourse by populists in Lebanon is aiming at develop­ing the idea that proper represen­tation at the national and parlia­mentarian levels would not be secured if not every sect elects its members in parliament whether directly or indirectly. For this purpose, gerrymandering is being practised in all discussions pertaining to electoral laws, and proposed draft laws have nothing to do with reform, rather pursuing the attainment of the largest number of parliamentary seats.

    This populist approach is undoubtedly devastating to the fragile Lebanese democracy, to coexistence and partnership in the country. When every sect will be strictly allowed to elect its members, populist and extremist discourse will be on the rise, especially when candidates must address solely members of their sects; whereas, this will not be the case had electoral bases been diversified.

    This populist approach will lead to additional fragmentation of political life in Lebanon. It might be an introduction to mess with the intricate balances of power at the local level. The redistribution of political power as stipulated by the Taif accord that ceased the 15-year civil war might be revis­ited in one way or another. Whether this parallels former regional efforts to resketch the local power-sharing formula is an issue to be examined thoroughly in the days to come.

    Populism in Lebanon has its characteristics, true. Yet, it conforms to the international trend of populism: Introducing chaos!

    Editors' Picks

    The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

    From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

    Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

    Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Dalal Saoud

    Senior Editor: John Hendel

    Chief Copy Editors: Jonathan Hemming and Richard Pretorius

    Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

    Opinion Section Editor: Claude Salhani

    East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

    Levant Section Editor: Jamal J. Halaby

    Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

    Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

    Senior Correspondents:

    Mahmud el-Shafey (London)

    Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)


    Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

    Dunia El-Zobeidi (London)

    Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

    Rasha Elass - Thomas Seibert (Washington)

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

    Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

    Tel 020 3667 7249

    Mohamed Al Mufti

    Marketing & Advertising Manager

    Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

    Direct: +44 20 8742 9262


    Al Arab Publishing House

    Kensington Centre

    66 Hammersmith Road

    London W14 8UD, UK

    Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

    Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

    Follow Us
    © The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved