Gregory Aftandilian is a lecturer at the Pardee School of Global Studies at Boston University and is a former U.S. State Department Middle East analyst.

  • Trump’s immigration ban evokes a dark period in US history, On: Sun, 12 Feb 2017

  • Trump’s comments about Iraqi oil are dangerous , On: Sun, 05 Feb 2017

  • Trump’s temptation to pursue the strongman option in Libya , On: Sun, 22 Jan 2017

  • Trump’s choice for Israel envoy likely to be resisted, On: Sun, 25 Dec 2016

  • Much of Trump’s Syria policy likely to be coordinated with Russia, On: Sun, 11 Dec 2016

  • Trump’s extreme views likely to be checked by system, On: Sun, 04 Dec 2016

  • Obama’s strategy against ISIS looks successful but comes at a high price, On: Sun, 27 Nov 2016

  • Trump’s victory likely to improve US-Egyptian ties , On: Sun, 20 Nov 2016

  • Trump’s outlandish foreign policy claims unlikely to boost his standing, On: Sun, 23 Oct 2016

  • Reconstruction costs of damaged Iraqi cities another looming crisis, On: Sun, 23 Oct 2016

  • US officials unable to deal with Syrian conflict , On: Sun, 16 Oct 2016

  • Large US aid deal for Israel helps shield Clinton from Republican attacks, On: Sun, 02 Oct 2016

  • Demographics to favour Clinton in US presidential race, On: Sun, 25 Sep 2016

  • Syrian Kurds’ calculations, between Turkey and US , On: Sun, 18 Sep 2016

  • US-Saudi relations in rough waters , On: Sun, 18 Sep 2016

  • Ethnic tensions rise as the battle for Mosul looms , On: Sun, 28 Aug 2016

  • Egypt’s bid to revive Israeli-Palestinian peace talks has risks and benefits, On: Sun, 21 Aug 2016

  • Obama’s Russian gambit getting flak from all sides , On: Sun, 14 Aug 2016

  • Egypt’s reaction to Turkish coup attempt scuttles prospects of rapprochement , On: Sun, 07 Aug 2016

  • Trump’s stands go against Republican foreign policy positions, On: Sun, 24 Jul 2016

  • Obama faces growing criticism on Syria, On: Sun, 03 Jul 2016

  • Trump’s bigotry leading to drop in the polls, On: Sun, 19 Jun 2016

  • Saudi-Iran tensions show no sign of abating , On: Sun, 12 Jun 2016

  • Cairo pursues a different tactic with EgyptAir crash, On: Sun, 05 Jun 2016

  • Sykes-Picot is about Western opposition to national aspirations , On: Sun, 29 May 2016

  • Hawkish roles reversed in US campaign , On: Sun, 22 May 2016

  • US lacks new policy ideas for Iraq, On: Sun, 15 May 2016

  • Pentagon considers troop reduction in Sinai, causing Mideast concern, On: Sun, 08 May 2016

  • US decision to send more special operations forces to Syria raises concerns at home , On: Sun, 08 May 2016

  • Obama’s worldview at odds with Riyadh’s, On: Sun, 01 May 2016

  • Mixed signals from US Congress on aid to Egypt , On: Sun, 24 Apr 2016

  • No clear winners in Yemen war , On: Sun, 17 Apr 2016

  • If Syria talks fail, US might support partition , On: Sun, 17 Apr 2016

  • Ted Cruz’s extreme views stir concern , On: Fri, 08 Apr 2016

  • Obama’s budget request on MENA is ISIS-focused, On: Fri, 18 Mar 2016

  • Iraq’s internal problems hindering fight against ISIS , On: Fri, 18 Mar 2016

  • Is Obama shifting to a more realistic foreign policy?, On: Fri, 11 Mar 2016

  • Egypt’s Libya calculus , On: Fri, 04 Mar 2016

  • How Iraq war is helping Trump, On: Fri, 04 Mar 2016

  • Trump’s immigration ban evokes a dark period in US history

    What is less widely known is that fear of immigrants and efforts to restrict immigra­tion have antecedents in US history.

    2017/02/12 Issue: 93 Page: 17

    The political firestorm sparked by US Presi­dent Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily banning travellers and immi­grants from seven Muslim-major­ity countries as well as all Syrian refugees, though now blocked by a federal appeals court, has reawakened debate in the United States about what it means to be American. What is less widely known is that fear of immigrants and efforts to restrict immigra­tion have antecedents in US history.

    The great wave of immigration to the United States occurred from the late 19th and the early 20th centuries when millions of people fleeing poverty or reli­gious/nationalist persecution, mainly from Eastern and South­ern Europe, headed to the United States. The vast majority of these immigrants had unhindered access, largely to provide a cheap source of labour for American industry.

    This welcoming atmosphere changed as fear of the new immigrants started to grow among so-called native Americans, who believed that the immigrants were infiltrating the United States with radicals inspired by the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and anar­chists from Southern Europe who would change the United States for the worse.

    In addition, in the early 20th century dubious American scientists propagated the theory of eugenics — a belief that races of people from North-Western Europe were superior to others, a sentiment that gained popularity among Americans.

    This culminated in the Immi­gration Act of 1924, which severely restricted immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe and the Middle East. The act based immigration ceilings from any particular country at 2% of their representation in the 1890 census. Immigrants from China and Japan were barred altogether.

    As the bulk of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe arrived in the decades after 1890, this legislation was a blatant attempt to severely reduce the number of immigrants from those regions. Italians and Eastern European Jews were particularly hard hit but other groups, such as Armenians, were adversely affected as well.

    For example, in the decade after 1890, about 200,000 Italians migrated to the United States annually. Under the 1924 law, fewer than 4,000 Italians were allowed in each year. Under the same 1924 law, only 100 Syrians were allowed in per year.

    The 1924 legislation passed overwhelmingly.

    One of the sponsors of the 1924 act, US Senator David Reed, R-Pennsylvania, explained at the time that “unless immigration is numerically restrained [the United States] will be over­whelmed by a vast migration of peoples from war-stricken Europe”.

    Reed added that the “races of men who have been coming to us in recent years are wholly dissimi­lar to the native-born Americans [and] are untrained in self-gov­ernment” and went on to decry the creation of “foreign colonies” within the country, which he described as “groups of aliens, either in city slums or in country districts, who speak a foreign language and live a foreign life and who want neither to learn our common speech nor to share our common life”.

    Sound familiar? Trump is taking a page out of this dark history and applying it to the present time, fed by his chief adviser Steve Bannon, a self-described American nationalist. Trump and his team are stoking fear among a large segment of the American people who say Muslim immigrants cannot be fully trusted because they are or will be infiltrated by terrorists.

    Such sentiments were expressed January 30th to a CNN reporter who interviewed middle-aged and elderly people in a restaurant in Hazleton, Pennsyl­vania. Ironically, some of the people who were interviewed and expressed such views had last names suggesting that their parents or grandparents were probably the objects of similar scorn a century ago. They have conveniently forgotten this history and now seem to play the role that Americans did back then.

    Fortunately, as former president Barack Obama often said, the arc of American history is upward even with setbacks.

    Although it was not until 1965 that the Immigration Act of 1924 was replaced, over time prejudi­cial attitudes do dissipate in the United States. During the second world war, millions of immigrant Americans and their American-born offspring were no longer considered foreigners as they showed by their sacrifices that they were just as patriotic as anyone else, and that helped to break down barriers.

    It took a couple more genera­tions for African Americans to be given their full rights, and while problems of discrimination remain, they have been able to make significant strides in the last several decades.

    The demonstrations against Trump’s Muslim-centred immi­gration ban, often led by young people of varied backgrounds, give hope that this latest attempt at immigration restrictions against and fear of the other will dissipate. This time, the waiting time for a return to tolerance and acceptance is likely to be much shorter, even if Trump continues to play the fear card.

    Editors' Picks

    The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

    From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

    Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

    Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Dalal Saoud

    Senior Editor: John Hendel

    Chief Copy Editors: Jonathan Hemming and Richard Pretorius

    Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

    Opinion Section Editor: Claude Salhani

    East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

    Levant Section Editor: Jamal J. Halaby

    Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

    Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

    Senior Correspondents:

    Mahmud el-Shafey (London)

    Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)


    Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

    Dunia El-Zobeidi (London)

    Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

    Rasha Elass - Thomas Seibert (Washington)

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Contact editor

    Subscription & Advertising:

    Tel 020 3667 7249

    Mohamed Al Mufti

    Marketing & Advertising Manager

    Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

    Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

    Al Arab Publishing House

    Kensington Centre

    66 Hammersmith Road

    London W14 8UD, UK

    Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

    Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

    Follow Us
    © The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved