Sabahat Khan is a senior analyst at the Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis (INEGMA).

  • Making sense of Turkey selecting Russia’s S-400 air-defence system, On: Sun, 06 Aug 2017

  • Could a Turkish-Iranian axis develop after the Qatar crisis?, On: Sun, 30 Jul 2017

  • Where Afghanistan is heading and what it means for the Arab Gulf, On: Sun, 23 Jul 2017

  • Challenges of cultivating a Saudi defence industry, On: Sun, 09 Jul 2017

  • Is a US-Iran confrontation under Trump inevitable?, On: Sun, 25 Jun 2017

  • Iran’s economic challenges after election , On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017

  • Riyadh summit a watershed moment in regional landscape , On: Sun, 28 May 2017

  • UAE to develop new fighter jet with Russia , On: Sun, 02 Apr 2017

  • If NATO is not obsolete, what does that mean for Arab states?, On: Sun, 05 Mar 2017

  • Trump’s strategy against ISIS takes shape: The good, the bad and the ugly, On: Sun, 05 Feb 2017

  • Will Russia play ball with the US on Iran’s ballistic missile programme?, On: Sun, 22 Jan 2017

  • Israel and Hezbollah’s Golan calculations, On: Sun, 18 Dec 2016

  • What does Trump’s emerging team signal for Iran?, On: Sun, 11 Dec 2016

  • Trump to face multiple challenges in Syria , On: Sun, 27 Nov 2016

  • Is Turkish military intervention in Syria and Iraq inevitable?, On: Sun, 06 Nov 2016

  • The ideological affinities of the Houthis with Iran, On: Sun, 30 Oct 2016

  • How have Iran’s military capabilities developed since 1979?, On: Sun, 16 Oct 2016

  • UAE launches pioneering programme to promote tolerance , On: Sun, 04 Sep 2016

  • Why are Russian operations in Syria being conducted out of Iran?, On: Sun, 21 Aug 2016

  • How important is Turkey to the Russians after all?, On: Sun, 14 Aug 2016

  • Turkish coup likely to strain relations with EU, On: Sun, 24 Jul 2016

  • Why Russia remains crucial to Turkey’s future, On: Sun, 17 Jul 2016

  • Questions about ISIS’s origins spark conspiracy theories, On: Sun, 26 Jun 2016

  • The case for focusing on development of special operations forces in the Middle East, On: Sun, 19 Jun 2016

  • The motives behind the newly announced UK naval base in Oman , On: Sun, 29 May 2016

  • Naval modernisation crucial for Saudis , On: Sun, 08 May 2016

  • Israel’s self-serving view of the Syrian war, On: Fri, 08 Apr 2016

  • Can NATO model help Saudis build an Islamic alliance?, On: Fri, 25 Mar 2016

  • US targets ISIS chemical weapons capability, On: Fri, 18 Mar 2016

  • The stakes in Saudi moves against Hezbollah , On: Fri, 04 Mar 2016

  • How significant are sanctions against Iran’s ballistic missile programme?, On: Fri, 19 Feb 2016

  • Iranian surveillance drone targets a US carrier, On: Fri, 05 Feb 2016

  • Early warning capabilities remain strategic for GCC , On: Fri, 05 Feb 2016

  • Saudi-Iranian tensions and the prospects for mediation , On: Fri, 29 Jan 2016

  • Closer ties between Turkey and Gulf countries, On: Fri, 22 Jan 2016

  • Significance of Iran rocket tests in the Strait of Hormuz, On: Fri, 15 Jan 2016

  • Arab militaries adapt to ‘hybrid’ threats, On: Fri, 08 Jan 2016

  • Russia faces limits of hard power in Syria , On: Fri, 08 Jan 2016

  • Anti-ISIS coalition needs ground troops in Syria , On: Fri, 11 Dec 2015

  • Making sense of Turkey selecting Russia’s S-400 air-defence system

    Reports suggest Ankara is close to finalising a $2.5 billion deal to acquire Russia’s S-400 air- and missile-defence system.

    Long-standing prowess. Russian S-400 Triumph medium-range and long-range surface-to-air missile systems ride through Red Square, last May. (AFP)


    2017/08/06 Issue: 118 Page: 13



    Dubai - As friction between Tur­key and its ostensible allies in the West grows, numerous reports cite Turkish and Russian of­ficials suggesting that Ankara is close to finalising a nearly $2.5 bil­lion deal to acquire Russia’s S-400 air- and missile-defence system. This would mark a sharp pivot from Turkey’s traditional axis and the clearest indicator yet of Ankara’s thinking.

    In 2015, it looked as if Turkey had selected the Chinese-manufac­tured FD-2000 system. However, after what was thought to be sig­nificant pressure from the United States, Ankara was persuaded to re­start the process. The possibility of more competitive proposals from Turkey’s US and European sup­pliers likely sweetened that particular pill.

    Simultaneous to this process has been grow­ing rift between Europe and Russia. In the last few years, NATO has been establishing a ballistic missile shield using US and European systems to counter the growing threat of missile prolif­eration from countries such as Iran and North Korea.

    Such moves have been greeted with suspicion in Moscow. For the Kremlin, NATO’s plans appear to be focused primarily on Russia and, as such, pose a threat to the estab­lished balance of power. Russia is working on developing weapons it claims will effectively negate NATO’s missile defence plans in Europe.

    At a time of such mistrust be­tween NATO and Moscow, which may have contributed to Russian military intervention in Ukraine and Syria, Ankara’s growing align­ment with Moscow takes on new and significant implications.

    For the United States, Turkey’s selection of the Chinese FD-2000 was bad enough. However, Tur­key’s shift to Russia as its technol­ogy partner in air- and missile- de­fence is far more worrying.

    The S-400 will have no interoper­ability with US and European sys­tems used by NATO. Key alliance members would hardly tolerate a Russian system being integrated into their network, even if it was technically possible. Russia has de­ployed the S-400 in Syria and sold a less-advanced variant to Iran fol­lowing the lifting of international sanctions against it regarding the nuclear deal.

    Turkey’s longer-term commit­ment to NATO is another important issue. There is a growing percep­tion that Turkey’s trust in NATO has been hit hard. Some Turks say NATO’s support was below ex­pectations as its southern borders were affected by the Syrian civil war. Western voices were similarly muted during the related stand-off between Turkey and Russia after­ward, though that has since been resolved.

    Separately, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his rul­ing party lashed out at what they saw as slow and weak condemna­tion by NATO allies of an attempted military coup last year. Greece and Germany have been accused of granting asylum to Turkish military personnel wanted by Ankara for involvement in the coup plot, fuel­ling suspicions of Western backing or support to topple the Turkish government. Possibly as a result, Ankara has downsized its represen­tation at NATO headquarters.

    European goodwill towards An­kara has similarly cooled follow­ing what many see as an excessive crackdown on political opposition within Turkey. The barring of en­try by Germany and Netherlands to Turkish politicians seeking to participate in public rallies for ex­patriate Turks created a sour at­mosphere and illustrated a growing mutual dislike.

    Ultimately, not only have Turkish aspirations of EU membership been called into question, many wonder whether Turkey will preserve its longer-term alliance with the West through its membership of NATO. In the middle is the United States, which has struggled to mediate be­tween the two increasingly belliger­ent sides.

    Still, nothing is definite yet. Pro­curing the S-400 system will, An­kara claimed, provide it with the kind of technology transfer that US and European allies have proven unwilling to trust Ankara with.

    In theory, the door remains open for Turkey to procure US or Eu­ropean systems, to be operated separately. Alternatively, Turkey could choose to play a prominent role in the NATO missile-defence programme in exchange for the al­liance funding a deployment of sys­tems in Turkey.

    Ankara may genuinely not want to abandon its traditional strategic alliance with the West but its grow­ing tendency to venture out further is likely indicative of its longer-term ambitions and outlook. Either way, the acquisition of the S-400 adds to the increasingly strategic dimensions of a renewing Turkish- Russian partnership.

    Editors' Picks

    The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

    From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

    Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

    Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

    Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

    Senior Editor: John Hendel

    Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

    Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

    Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

    East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

    Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

    Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

    Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

    Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

    Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

    Regular Columnists

    Claude Salhani

    Yavuz Baydar

    Correspondents

    Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

    Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

    Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

    Thomas Seibert (Washington)

    Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi

    Designers

    Ibrahim Ben Bechir

    Hanen Jebali

    Published by Al Arab Publishing House

    Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

    Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

    Tel 020 3667 7249

    Mohamed Al Mufti

    Marketing & Advertising Manager

    Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

    Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

    www.alarab.co.uk

    Al Arab Publishing House

    Kensington Centre

    177-179 Hammersmith Road

    London W6 8BS , UK

    Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

    Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

    Follow Us
    © The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved