Is a third intifada the only option left for the Palestinians?

By warning Israel against annex­ing West Bank, Trump appears to be returning to more tra­ditional US policy.

Palestinian protesters climb over the separation barrier with Israel during a demonstration in the village of Bilin near Ramallah. (AP)

2017/03/12 Issue: 97 Page: 11

The Arab Weekly
Dalal Saoud

Beirut - The little hope that Pales­tinians have been hanging on for establishing their own state has been damp­ened by US President Donald Trump’s confusing vision of settling the nearly 70-year-old Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Breaking with two decades of US commitment to the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Is­rael by suggesting that he would be “happy” with whatever Israel and the Palestinians “like” in terms of one-state or two-state solutions, Trump would be throwing the Pal­estinians into the lion’s den.

By washing his hands of a stag­nant peace process and dropping the US role as a broker, Trump would be opening the way for Israe­li Prime Minister Binyamin Netan­yahu to achieve his goal: Complete sovereignty, total security control over the area west of the Jordan River and recognition of the Jewish state.

It is not that the Palestinians were counting much on the peace pro­cess — dead for a long time — but the absence of such an internationally sponsored negotiations framework and taking away the two-state solu­tion are leaving them in limbo, with no options but to create new ways to confront the Israeli occupation.

“With Trump dropping the two-state solution, the peace process is finished and when he leaves the Is­raelis and Palestinians on their own and says find a solution and [he] will not interfere, this means that he opened the way for the strongest party, which is the occupier, i.e. Is­rael, to do what it wants practically on the ground,” said Michel Nawfal, a researcher at the Institute for Pal­estine Studies in Beirut.

Long-standing US policy was based on the two-state paradigm, stopping illegal Jewish settlement expansion and refraining from moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a move promised by Trump during his election cam­paign.

Under the two-state solution — the fruit of decades of international efforts to end the conflict — the Pal­estinians would have their own in­dependent state alongside the state of Israel, both coexisting peacefully. The Palestinian state would be es­tablished along the pre-1967 so-called Green Line that demarcates the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, which the Palestinians seek as their capital. Palestinians, as stated by senior Palestinian ne­gotiator Saeb Erekat, have accepted the notion that a Palestinian state will account for just 22% of historic Palestine.

The one-state solution provides for merging Israel, the West Bank and Gaza but leaves Israel with con­cerns over demographic changes and its ability to preserve the coun­try’s Jewish character. For the Pales­tinians, that would mean an apart­heid state for Israelis are not willing to accept it to be a democratic, sec­ular state in which Jews, Christians and Muslims live together.

With Trump in office and much influence from his team of staunch supporters of Israel and its settler-colonialism, Israel is the “strongest party in this equation and without an honest broker that leaves them on their own, the door is open for Israel to win,” Nawfal said.

He argued that Israelis do not want negotiations or a settlement based on international law that would allow the Palestinians to have a sovereign state. “Their real strategy is to manage the crisis… expand the Jewish settlements in a way there will be no base for estab­lishing a Palestinian authority,” he said. “What could be left (of Pales­tinian territories) could make a Ban­tustan or be annexed to Jordan.”

Despite their differences, the Palestinians are holding on to their long-time demands to have their own state; the return of the refu­gees expelled from their land in 1948 and 1967 and the right of self-determination.

“The Palestinians’ national goal has not changed. This land needs to have an independent sovereignty and the people ruling themselves like any other people in the world,” said Suheil el-Natour, a Beirut-based Palestinian activist in the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP). “After Trump’s election, what changed is the blunt disclosure of the real goal of the Is­raelis, which is: No state, no sover­eignty for the Palestinians and no right to return for the refugees.”

Israel is thus taking measures to “create a de facto situation”, emp­tying Palestinian areas through demolishing houses, forced expul­sions and arming Jewish settlers, Natour explained. “Israelis will continue on creating new realities on the ground and the Palestinians will never recognise a Jewish state. Thus, no surrender,” he said.

That will leave no more room for negotiations and likely pave the way for a third intifada.

“We could be effectively on the road to a third intifada,” Nawfal said, expecting an “outburst of an­ger”, especially if the US embassy is moved to Jerusalem. “There is a sit­uation ready to explode, probably lacking a spark that could be trig­gered by the interaction of Trump’s approach and the policies of the Is­raeli hardliners.”

The new uprising, he said, would be a “wide civil disobedience like the first intifada, which really ex­posed the ordeal and tragedy of the Palestinians in its ugliest images to the Western public opinion. I can’t see any other way out for the time being.”

To reach that point, the Palestin­ians should end their internal dis­putes and unite to face Israel, said Natour, who said he also expected a third intifada to let the Israelis feel how “exhausting it is for them to oc­cupy our land”.

Armed action could be the last re­sort, he said, referring to “all kinds of allowed struggles,” including civil disobedience and economic boycott inside the Palestinian ter­ritories.

By warning Israel against annex­ing the West Bank as disclosed by Israeli Defence Minister Avidgor Lieberman on March 6th, Trump appears to be returning to more tra­ditional US policy.

But let’s wait and see. As Natour concluded: “There is occupation and expulsion. Six million Pales­tinians living in the diaspora and 6 million inside the territories. Even Israel doesn’t know how to solve this problem.”

Dalal Saoud is the Deputy Editor-in-Chief of The Arab Weekly. She is based in Beirut.

As Printed
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Regular Columnists

Claude Salhani

Yavuz Baydar


Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi


Ibrahim Ben Bechir

Hanen Jebali

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor

Subscription & Advertising:

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved