Hariri’s resignation postponement offers Lebanon fragile reprieve

Brief respite. Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri (L) kisses the forehead of Lebanese Grand Mufti Abdellatif Deryan ahead of their meeting at the Government Palace in Beirut, on November 22. (Dalati and Nohra)

2017/11/26 Issue: 133 Page: 10

The Arab Weekly
Nicholas Blanford

Beirut- The decision by Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri to put his resignation on hold has, for now, eased a crisis that threatened to send Lebanon back into protracted political deadlock. But it remains unclear what the Iran-backed Hez­bollah is willing to concede to Hariri to ensure that he continues in office.

Hariri returned to Beirut on No­vember 22, more than two weeks after his shock resignation an­nouncement, to mark Lebanon’s independence day. He announced that he would suspend his resig­nation. Sources close to the prime minister say it is conditional on Lebanon maintaining close ties to other Arab nations and all Lebanese parties abiding by the policy of dis­association from meddling in the af­fairs of other countries.

“Now we must fortify our rela­tions with all our Arab brothers by having Lebanon’s interest as the basis and not harm our Arab broth­ers or any other country,” Hariri said on his return to Beirut. “We do not want to harm a country for the in­terest of another, but we are within an Arab system that we should pre­serve. Disassociation is the basis in the ministerial statement, and this is what we must emphasise and ap­ply and not just say.”

The comments on disassociation are directed squarely at Hezbollah, which is involved in at least three conflicts in the region. Hezbollah has admitted to deploying forces to Syria and Iraq but continues to deny any role in the war in Yemen.

In 2012, the Lebanese govern­ment agreed to a policy of disassoci­ation to keep the country out of the conflicts roiling the region, particu­larly in neighbouring Syria, which was descending into full-blown civil war at the time. However, a year later, Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah confirmed that his fighters were operating in Syria to preserve the regime of President Bashar Assad. Since then, Hezbol­lah has played a key role in helping Syrian government forces crush the rebels and safeguard Assad’s rule.

It is in Hezbollah’s interest that Hariri remain as prime minister. He is regarded as a credible and mod­erate Sunni leader in Lebanon who is well thought of internationally. Since he took office a year ago as head of a coalition government that included Hezbollah, Lebanon has enjoyed some welcome stability. But Hariri’s compromising behav­iour was seen by Riyadh as a fig leaf for Hezbollah to dominate Lebanon and pursue its Iran-guided policies across the Middle East. That appar­ently led the Saudis to strong-arm Hariri into resigning.

But what can Hezbollah offer to satisfy Hariri’s conditions and ap­pease the Saudis? Perhaps Nasral­lah pointed the way in a speech on November 20 in which he said he was prepared to withdraw his fight­ers from Iraq now that the territo­rial battle against the Islamic State (ISIS) was over.

“We consider that the mission has been accomplished, but we are wait­ing for the final Iraqi victory decla­ration,” he said. “If we find that it is over and that there is no need for the presence of these brothers, they will return to be deployed in any other arena that needs them.”

Hezbollah dispatched about 250 trainers and advisers to Iraq fol­lowing ISIS’s takeover of Mosul in 2014. Their role was to assist the 150,000-strong Popular Mobilisa­tion Forces, the Shia militia con­glomerate, rather than to partici­pate in the fighting against ISIS.

In Syria, the war is entering a less intensive phase that may give Hez­bollah some latitude to reduce its footprint in the country. Hezbollah has lately withdrawn some of its fighters, including special forces units, from Syria and deployed them in Lebanon in reaction to heightened concerns about a loom­ing war with Israel. Nasrallah could possibly spin the redeployment of fighters from Syria as a commit­ment to the disassociation policy, although it is inconceivable that he would agree to a full withdrawal.

Yemen is a more thorny issue and also Saudi Arabia’s main bone of contention with Hezbollah. Hez­bollah continues to deny any role in Yemen. However, sources close to the party have admitted that some fighters are operating in a training and advisory capacity with Houthi tribesmen in the war-torn coun­try. Additionally, wounded Houthi fighters have been treated in Hez­bollah-run hospitals in Lebanon and others have received advanced training at Hezbollah camps in south Lebanon and the Bekaa Val­ley, the sources said.

“Hezbollah is responsible for all the training in Yemen and the firing of ballistic missiles and special op­erations,” a source said.

Hezbollah’s alleged role in the occasional firing of ballistic mis­siles into Saudi Arabia, other than annoying the Saudis, may have the ancillary benefit of allowing the missile teams to hone their skills on advanced systems under battlefield conditions ahead of a future war with Israel, according to a Western intelligence source. Hezbollah is widely believed to have amassed a rocket arsenal that includes variants of the solid-fuelled Fatah-110, some of which are fitted with inertial guidance systems and have a range of up to 700km.

“The Yemen war is a good oppor­tunity for Hezbollah to tinker with payload and guidance systems to help improve range and accuracy. That’s a useful experience for any future war with Israel,” the intelli­gence source said.

Nevertheless, it would be diffi­cult for Nasrallah to agree to end Hezbollah’s involvement in Yemen when he denies his forces are there in the first place.

Much will depend on the ongo­ing stance of Saudi Arabia towards Hariri, Lebanon and Hezbollah. It seems evident that the Saudis mis­calculated with their Hariri resigna­tion ploy, but that does not mean the kingdom will soften its attitude concerning Hezbollah and Lebanon if Nasrallah is unwilling to concede anything to Hariri. The crisis may have dissipated with Hariri’s return to Beirut, but it could be far from over.

Nicholas Blanford is the author of Warriors of God: Inside Hezbollah’s Thirty-Year Struggle Against Israel (Random House 2011). He lives in Beirut.

As Printed
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Regular Columnists

Claude Salhani

Yavuz Baydar


Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi


Ibrahim Ben Bechir

Hanen Jebali

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262


Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved