Israeli settlement movement kept alive by government money
Cracks in the picture. Buildings under construction are seen in the Israeli settlement of Modiin Illit in the occupied West Bank.(Reuters)
2017/04/09 Issue: 101 Page: 14
West Bank - After five years, Batsheva Reback could not take living in an Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank any longer.
Despite renting a house with a garden for far less than it would cost in Israel itself, it did not make sense. Her new apartment in Israel may be small but, unlike where she used to live, it has a supermarket and a clinic nearby. It is a quicker commute to work and she feels her children are safer.
“It’s easier to get things done,” said the 26-year-old kindergarten assistant, adding that the decision was not based on expedience alone. “I started feeling uncomfortable living in a settlement. Personally, I don’t think building more and more settlements is going to help bring peace,” Reback said.
To the world, the narrative on Israeli settlements often reads one way: More of them being built, with more settlers moving in. There are, however, cracks in the picture and signs that Reback’s perspective is not uncommon. Settlers are getting fed up.
Statistics show the population continues to rise, having reached about 400,000 in the West Bank and 200,000 in East Jerusalem.
Behind the figures lies a different story. Although the population may have risen by nearly two-thirds in the past decade, the rate of increase has slowed sharply, Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics said.
A decade ago, for every 1,000 settlers living in occupied territory, 20 more arrived each year. Now the expansion rate is six per 1,000.
“The settlement enterprise is waning and what is left is being artificially kept alive by the government pouring money in,” said Shaul Arieli, an analyst at the Economic Cooperation Foundation, a think-tank that advocates for a two-state solution to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict.
Since capturing the West Bank in the 1967 Middle East war, Israeli governments have helped establish more than 120 settlements, spending billions of dollars to build tens of thousands of homes and the infrastructure to support them.
There are also scores of informal settler outposts, some of which have received government funding.
Israel’s right-wing government has promised to build thousands more units this year to accommodate what it calls “natural growth” — families having more children.
Yet while population growth in the settlements is higher than the national average, its rate is also falling: In 1995, it stood at 10%. By 2015, was 4%.
Leaders of the settler movement say the decline stems from government curbs on construction: People are not moving to the settlements because there are not enough homes to house them.
The international community views settlements on occupied land as a breach of international law and an obstacle to peace between Israelis and Palestinians, who envision a state in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza.
Palestinians see any expansion of settlements as part of an Israeli project to deny them a state.
“They are building settlements at a rate of construction that is politically motivated,” Xavier Abu Eid, spokesman for the Palestinian Authority’s Negotiations Affairs Department. “Settlements and the incentives given to settlers are part of the Israeli government’s agenda. The two-state solution is clearly not.”
Settlement population growth is now largely driven by a handful of settlements built for the ultra- Orthodox community, whose families on average have six children.
Over the past two decades, the two main ultra-orthodox settlements — Beitar Illit and Modiin Illit — have grown from comprising about 10% of the West Bank settler population to making up nearly one-third of it.
Unlike many of the hard-line, ideological settlements deep in the West Bank, Beitar Illit and Modiin Illit are adjacent to Israel and would probably be incorporated in any peace deal with the Palestinians. Their cramped apartment blocks stand in stark contrast to the red-roofed, spacious houses with gardens that identify most settlements built on West Bank hilltops.
Ultra-Orthodox residents say they moved here because it is cheap. The conflict with the Palestinians and settling the land are not on their minds.
“Politically I’m not bothered. All those global considerations are not something the average ultra-Orthodox family can afford,” said 37-year-old Motti Hizkiyahu, standing outside a discount store in Modiin Illit.
While the rate of people moving to settlements and the growth within them has tapered, there are also signs of a generational shift in some of the most established, ideological settlements that spearheaded the movement in the 1970s.
Itzik Fleger, a real-estate agent in Beit-El settlement, said the founding generation is ageing, their children are grown and some have moved away.
Arieli said the reality is different. While the settlements are numerous, with vast state infrastructure to support them, the enterprise is not big enough to sustain itself, he argued.
“The settlement movement has failed in creating the physical conditions for annexation,” he said, referring to the push to annex the area in which nearly all settlements are located. “The two-state solution is still strong and viable.”