The new Fatah has nothing to do with the old one

Are Fatah’s circumstances reason enough for new Fatah com­posed only of pro-Abbas figures?

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas speaks during Fatah congress in the West Bank city of Ramallah, on November 29th. (Reuters)


2016/12/04 Issue: 84 Page: 14


The Arab Weekly
Khairallah Khairallah



Two important aspects of the Fatah congress are worth noting. The first was the absence of any figure opposing Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. The second resided in the choice of the representatives of Palestinians abroad; they were all figures from the West Bank and Gaza who can hardly qualify as leaders.

We all probably agree that Abu Mazen — Abbas’s nom de guerre — is the last among the historic founders of Fatah movement, with the exception, of course, of Farouq Qaddoumi, who refuses to return to the Palestinian territo­ries and who no longer has a role to play, given his age (85).

For a long time, Abbas remained at the second row in the Palestin­ian leadership. He undoubtedly played a major role in determining the leadership’s foreign relations and especially the relationship with Moscow.

Thanks to his experience in diplomacy, Abbas acquired a fine knowledge of the various regional and international balances of power. He used his expertise during negotiations leading to the Oslo agreement, which was signed on the White House lawn in September 1993. That agreement opened Washington’s gates to Yasser Arafat.

We leave it to history to judge whether Arafat knew how to take advantage of that opportunity. As for Israel, it never imagined that the Oslo agreement could lead to a settlement acceptable to the Palestinians. By deciding to sign the agreement, Israel had wanted to prove that the Palestinians cannot uphold their promises.

Arafat, the historic leader of the Palestinians, remained at the head of Fatah party for almost half a century. Fatah was, right from the beginning, open to a variety of orientations and opinions. This diversity was a source of strength and a source of problems and divisions. Arafat was successful most of the time in controlling the crises.

So, with the exception of its beginnings, Fatah was never a single body. Splits and divisions appeared, especially when Fatah was based in Jordan.

During the civil war in Lebanon, Fatah turned itself into the Muslim army facing Christian forces. Some splinter groups espoused Maoist revolutionary ideologies and others adopted Khomeinist theories. There existed groups that were alleged to be from the Gulf countries, which, except for Oman, have always backed Fatah financially. Some were allied to Egyptian intelligence organisations and many had no allegiance but to the Palestinian cause, which has been overshadowed by sectarian strife in the region.

Under Arafat, Fatah fought many unnecessary conflicts with Hafez Assad’s regime in Syria and in Lebanon. It had lost serious competitors to Arafat, Khalil al-Wazir and Salah Khalaf. They competed with Arafat but when circumstances required they were his staunchest supporters.

On Arafat’s death in November 2004, only Abbas remained standing. Abbas was completely different from Arafat. He was a realist first and foremost. He inherited all of Arafat’s roles and titles, including president of the state of Palestine, but at every chance he behaved in such a way as to suggest that he refuses the power practices of his predeces­sor.

Abbas does not tolerate in his entourage any person with a strong personality. There is no room for discussion with him on any subject. Arafat knew how to use money to achieve his goals. Money was just another weapon at his disposal. Abbas’s attitude towards money was different. In addition, Abbas did not surround himself with people who can competently deal with the media. For him, information was not a weapon.

The questions remain: Are Fatah’s circumstances reason enough for a new Fatah com­posed only of pro-Abbas figures? Are they reason enough to set aside Arafat’s heritage with both its good and bad aspects?


Khairallah Khairallah is a Lebanese writer.


As Printed
MENA Now
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Regular Columnists

Claude Salhani

Yavuz Baydar

Correspondents

Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi

Designers

Ibrahim Ben Bechir

Hanen Jebali

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

www.alarab.co.uk

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved