What will Putin expect for supporting Assad?

On military front, Russia will seek permanent use of Tartus as naval base and probably Hmeimim as air base.


2017/01/22 Issue: 90 Page: 11


The Arab Weekly
John Daly



It is a not insignificant consideration, as it is beyond dispute that Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime would not have survived the last five years without Russian diplomatic, military and economic assis­tance.

Offering diplomatic support, after pro-democracy protests in Syria that erupted in March 2011 descended into a vicious civil war, Russia used its veto power in the UN Security Council to block attempts to remove Assad from power.

On the economic front, Russia provided the Syrian government with the sinews of war. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported that Syria’s arms contracts with Russia in 2011 and 2012 were worth $687 million. As the Syrian conflict spiralled into military deadlock, Russia began direct military intervention in the Syrian civil war in September 2015, sending troops, aircraft and warships.

More than any other external factor, this unprecedented show of Russian support for the beleaguered Syrian government allowed it to survive, even as the death toll and refugee flows surged.

This raises the question: What will Russian President Vladimir Putin seek as recompense for his commitment of diplomatic cover, military support and money? Not an altruistic man, Putin has cynically exploited the war for Russia’s own purposes, shoring up Moscow’s only significant Arab ally while using Syrian naval and air bases.

Russian expectations are likely to be twofold — military and economic.

On the military front, Russia will seek permanent use of Tartus as a naval base and probably Hmeimim as an air base; both already host Russian military forces. This would be a development of prime impor­tance for Russia, as it would counter eastern NATO maritime deployments into the Black Sea and the United States’ use of Incirlik air base in Turkey as well.

As for economic benefits, Russia will undoubtedly be invited to help renovate Syria’s battered hydrocarbon infrastruc­ture, which before the civil war was a key component of the country’s economy. Syria’s oil production has decreased from a peak close to 610,000 barrels per day (bpd) in 1995 to approxi­mately 379,000 bpd in 2008.

Following the outbreak of war, many oil fields fell under Islamic State (ISIS) control. By 2015 production had plummeted to 33,000 bpd. Russia is likely to gain a significant foothold in Middle East oil production, a region where foreign partnership has been fraught with difficul­ties.

The consequences of Russian intervention are not limited to Syria. On December 19th, a 22-year-old Turkish police officer assassinated the Russian ambas­sador to Turkey, Andrei Karlov, at an art exhibition in Ankara, shouting “Allahu akbar,” “Aleppo” and “revenge” before he was killed by security guards. Russia labelled Karlov’s killing “a terrorist act with all its implica­tions”.

Turkey and Russia have been on opposite sides of the conflict in Syria — the Russian govern­ment supports Assad and Turkey has been assisting the rebels. Despite this, Turkey and Iran, the major regional players in the Syrian tragedy, have sought to align their policies with Russia’s. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif have travelled to Moscow to confer with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

During the past five years, as the Syrian uprising transformed from domestic demonstrations into a major civil war, at least 400,000 Syrians have been killed, 1.9 million wounded and more than half the country’s 23 million population forced to flee their homes.

While the Assad regime with Russian military assistance slowly gains the upper hand, the only certainty seems to be that the killing will continue, from the battlefields of Syria to Russian soft targets beyond the killing fields. Whether Putin regards this as a worthwhile price to pay for increased Russian influence in the Middle East, no one can say.

What is also certain is that, more than any other outside influence, Russian military intervention has been the decisive one leading the Syrian warring factions to return to peace negotiations in Astana on January 23rd.


John Daly is a Washington-based specialist on Russian and post- Soviet affairs.


As Printed
MENA Now
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Dalal Saoud

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editors: Jonathan Hemming and Richard Pretorius

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

Opinion Section Editor: Claude Salhani

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Levant Section Editor: Jamal J. Halaby

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Senior Correspondents:

Mahmud el-Shafey (London)

Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Correspondents

Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobeidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Rasha Elass - Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

www.alarab.co.uk

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

66 Hammersmith Road

London W14 8UD, UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved