Bells are ringing for Turkey’s moment of decision

'Yes' vote would legitimise de facto singular rule that Erdogan represents as holder of executive presidency.


2017/02/05 Issue: 92 Page: 16


The Arab Weekly
Yavuz Baydar



Yes or no? This will be the question for nearly 55 million voters in Turkey when they go to the polls in April, unless the Erdogan government changes its mind and calls off the vote.

A “yes” vote would legitimise a de facto singular rule that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan represents as the holder of the executive presidency, establish­ing a sort of sultanate that many analysts agree would bring an end to the parliamentary system whose roots go back to the foundation of the republic in 1923.

In a nutshell, a “yes” vote would push Turkey into the league of autocracies in operation in Central Asia.

Erdogan was in full-scale “yes-I-can” mode when he launched the moves in January that led to the planned referen­dum. Playing his Machiavellian cards masterfully, he kept his ultra-nationalist adversary, Devlet Bahceli, who is the leader of the National Movement Party (MHP), closer, cementing an Islamo-conservative bloc in the majority.

In return, Bahceli, is rumoured to have been promised cabinet seats for the MHP. However, given Erdogan’s record of political treachery, concerns have risen that Bahceli’s move was an act of suicide for his party.

Much has been written about the power shift Erdogan has worked so hard for since 2011. In short, it would abolish the separation of powers, hand him maximum powers to form a government and shape the entire state apparatus.

By way of appointments, he would have nearly full control over the judiciary, guaranteeing immunity from charges on abuse of power and corruption. By keeping his party affiliation, he would be a commander-in-chief, having a potential to rule the country by also exerting control of the armed forces. He would be empowered to issue decrees at will and to abolish parliament as he sees fit.

Sezgin Tanrikulu, a Kurdish deputy of the main opposition, secular Republican People’s Party (CHP), described it astutely, using a football club as an analogy.

“Imagine a chairman of that club,” he wrote. “He gets elected at the same time as the chairman of the national football federa­tion. He has the right to appoint the members of the national referees’ committee and also professional football disciplinary commission. He shapes football arbitration committee as well. Not only that: If a player in his team misses a goal, he can fire that player. If the rival team happens to win against his team, he is entitled to punish the rival team. And, if despite all this, his team doesn’t win the champion­ship, he has the power to cancel the entire league!”

Back to the question. Will it be a “yes” after all or “no”? Figures by respected national pollster AKAM presented a snapshot that would disappoint Erdogan. The survey in the first half of January showed the “no” vote at 57.6% with the “yes” vote at 42.4%.

This explains why there has been a delay by Erdogan to ratify the bill by parliament that would make the April referendum a must. At the time of this writing, ten days had passed without presidential approval. İs there a change of heart? It may that the presence of a large “no” vote is worrisome for the ruling Justice and Democratic Party (AKP). If so, a way out would be either to wait until 2019 elections or to declare snap polls. This, it seems, is the AKP’s hard choice.

Presuming that the chaotic and acrimonious politics of Turkey advances to referendum, how will the “yes” and “no” sides build their campaigns? Erdogan has made it clear that, defying once more the constitution, he would arrange at least 40 rallies. His strength with the public is unquestionable and that is what his party, the AKP, counts on, in bringing the “yes” vote to between 55-60%. This corre­sponds to a total of the AKP and MHP vote.

There could be glitches along the way. The AKAM survey pointed out, for example, that the two-thirds of the ultra-nationalist voters of MHP said they would vote “no”. Anxious about this, Erdogan is pushing for further arrests and overall harassment of pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) deputies, just to appease those voters. If this is the pattern, it is taken for granted that the HDP would be under huge legal pressure.

On the other side of the equa­tion: The horror for the “no” side would be low voter turnout. The AKAM study indicated that 20% of the HDP voters polled said they are not willing to vote due to fear or mistrust. AKP likely hopes that harassment of the HDP would increase the possibility of a Kurdish boycott.

There are more concerns. Some CHP deputies openly warned that voters may be scared by assassi­nations and terrorist acts, accusing the AKP of using all means to manipulate the vote. Exaggerated or not, this shows that Turkey walks on razor’s edge.


Yavuz Baydar is a journalist based in Istanbul. A founding member of the Platform for Independent Journalism (P24) and a news analyst, he won the European Press Prize in 2014. He has been reporting on Turkey and journalism issues since 1980.


As Printed
MENA Now
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Regular Columnists

Claude Salhani

Yavuz Baydar

Correspondents

Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi

Designers

Ibrahim Ben Bechir

Hanen Jebali

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

www.alarab.co.uk

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved