Erdogan’s win, Turkey’s loss

Erdogan knows that his greatest asset is a fragmented opposition.


2017/04/23 Issue: 103 Page: 3


The Arab Weekly
Yavuz Baydar



“It doesn’t matter if you win the match 5-0 or 1-0,” Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said in an interview with CNN Interna­tional after a referendum vote increased his powers. “The ultimate goal is to win the game.”

A row erupted April 16 — the day of the vote — over what was alleged to be widescale fraud as even unstamped ballots were de­clared valid by the High Electoral Board while voting went on. The protests increased when interna­tional election monitors said the referendum had taken place on an “unlevel playing field, with an inadequate legal framework.”

Such reactions passed over Erdogan’s head swiftly. In a typical reaction, he used Turkish proverbs meaning the same thing: ”Do not beat the air” and ”It is too late now.”

This is vintage Erdogan, who has mastered his skills in defiance of rules and regulations. Therefore, there was something awkward in the opposition’s reaction to his challenges, as if they were entirely new.

What has taken place since April 16 is a repetition of what happened when Erdogan won the presiden­tial elections — again with a small majority, 51.7% of the vote — and refused, in defiance of the law, to resign immediately from his posts as prime minister and party leader. That was on August 10, 2014. It was the same opposition, led by the secular Republican People’s Party (CHP), that cried foul and took the case to the Supreme Court, which eventually rejected it.

From then on, emboldened by a meek top judiciary, Erdogan led the country, in breach of the constitu­tion, as a partial president. The recent referendum simply gave legitimacy to autocratic rule. Those in opposition, once more seeking justice in an apparently compro­mised top judiciary, will most likely end up with another defeat. The CHP has failed to draw the conclu­sions that legalism in a country where rule of law no longer applies is simply meaningless.

The core matter for the opposi­tion was to find an efficient way to block the paths for the referendum to take place, such as en masse resignations from parliament, to force Erdogan’s hand by snap elec­tions. However, it was doomed as soon as it accepted to be part of his game.

This is not to say that what the “no” camp on the referendum achieved is to be belittled. Against the odds, it managed to shatter the ground on which Erdogan stands. The anti-Erdogan camp showed that it constituted more or less half of the society and also made it clear to the world that the crisis-and-division politics led by the president left Turkey fragmented into three parts: Secular-centrist western Anatolia and the southern coasts, the pious heartland and a solid Kurdish south-east.

Regardless of the corrosive dispute over it, the result — 51.41% voted “yes” — that granted Er­dogan unchecked executive pow­ers leaves the questions: Will he be able to hold the country together and carry it through stability? To do that, will he lower his tempera­ture and adopt a softer line vis-à-vis his domestic opponents and the international community?

Erdogan’s timetable makes them rather urgent to address. The passed constitutional amendments require that there be presidential elections in August 2019, possibly along with local and general elec­tions. The April 16 results put him under additional pressure. Those who have carefully followed this masterful politician, who perfected skills to turn a defeat to a victory, may be right when they predict that there is nothing to stop him.

Erdogan knows that he has the European leaders on his side, albeit discreetly. “We need him,” said a top European diplomat. “There is much business on various areas, so do not expect any confrontation, no matter what.”

As compared to pre-coup at­tempt, Erdogan now has a perfect tool in his hands, the state of emer­gency, which he can extend as he pleases, with a powerful majority of his party in parliament. That the first step he took after the refer­endum was to extend the state of emergency by three months should be a hint of what to expect.

With most of the obstacles out of his way, Erdogan can focus even more deeply on a cleansing within his party. He most certainly will go on using fierce language against current and newly invented en­emies, a tactic he sees as necessary to keep his supporting masses around him.

There should be no doubt that Erdogan will use emergency rule to continue to crush the opposi­tion, including the secular CHP, as soon as he sees a threat for the next elections. His insistence on reintroducing the death penalty is meant to spread fear among dis­senters.

Erdogan knows that his greatest asset is a fragmented opposition whose various factions are deeply hostile to each other. He would predict it to remain that way. He has succeeded to play them against each other and will probably see to it that the rest of the deputies of the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Demo­cratic Party (HDP) also end up in jail.

The Kurdish issue challenges the stability argument Erdogan has hunted votes for. While secular Turks will remain silently defi­ant to his rule, the conflict with the Kurds, within and outside Turkey’s borders, and a losing game with Syria, will be the main factor undermining stability and predictability. Erdogan is stuck with a militarist methodology and militarists surrounding him are entrenched like vultures.

Turkey has entered a dark tun­nel, with no light at the other end. If the last year’s coup attempt was a blow to Turkey’s dreams for a democratic order, April 16 caused enormous trauma. Erdogan has won, Turkey has lost.


Yavuz Baydar is a journalist based in Istanbul. A founding member of the Platform for Independent Journalism (P24) and a news analyst, he won the European Press Prize in 2014. He has been reporting on Turkey and journalism issues since 1980.


As Printed
MENA Now
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Regular Columnists

Claude Salhani

Yavuz Baydar

Correspondents

Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi

Designers

Ibrahim Ben Bechir

Hanen Jebali

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

www.alarab.co.uk

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved