It might take decades to reform al-Azhar

Some Egyptian diplomats fear that the conflict between the government and al-Azhar may be turned into an attack on Islam.


2017/05/14 Issue: 106 Page: 7


The Arab Weekly
Ahmed Abou Douh



The Egyptian Constitu­tion of 2014 gave al-Azhar, the coun­try’s top Islamic seat of learning, complete independence from the state. The venerable institu­tion lost nothing of its traditional theological role and religious influence in the country.

It was feared that al-Azhar would fall under the total control of the Muslim Brotherhood, which had infiltrated the institution’s highest authority, the Council of Senior Scholars.

The grand imam of al-Azhar, Ahmed el-Tayeb, however, was apprehensive of the rising career of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi while in his previous role as min­ister of defence. Tayeb was aware that, if the general took power, al-Azhar would revert to its role as an analyst of the government’s policies, a role it has assumed since the time of President Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Nasser was the first president to thrust al-Azhar into politics in modern Egypt, hoping that it would help in the transition to a socialist regime. During the coro­nation of King Farouk I in 1936, the prime minister at that time, Moustafa el-Nahas Pasha, refused to let the 16-year-old regent take the oath of allegiance before al- Azhar’s senior scholars; he had him take it before the parliament as a gesture marking the begin­ning of the secular state.

Nasser needed the backing of al- Azhar to give religious legitimacy to the government’s new policies, which were questioned and op­posed by political Islamists, especially the Muslim Brotherhood. Sisi also appealed to al-Azhar for support when he overthrew Mu­hammad Morsi in July 2013. Today, it looks as if Sisi is determined to disturb the murky waters of al- Azhar knowing the risks involved.

Ahmed Hosny, the president of al-Azhar University, during a tele­vised appearance in May, blatantly accused researcher and journal­ist Islam Behery of apostasy. On the same programme, Hosny said al-Azhar “cannot declare mem­bers of [ISIS] as apostates because the organisation is committing individual acts but, in the end, they are Unitarians.” These dec­larations cost Hosny his position following a general outcry in the country and returned the issue of religious extremism at al-Azhar to the forefront.

It seems that the eternal power struggle in religious affairs in Egypt is still raging between ex­tremist Salafists and the so-called moderates. In 2014, Abd Dayim Nasir, adviser to the imam of al- Azhar, declared that “the Salafists want to turn al-Azhar into a politi­cal instrument. We’re against that because we do not want to have the law subjugated to a religious power which decides what is right and what is wrong.”

Three years later, it looks as if Nasir was far from reality. It seems that al-Azhar is once again victim of the full religious powers and independence granted to it by the constitution. It is facing a mini intellectual rebellion.

Journalist Ahmed al-Khatib said 12 members of al-Azhar’s Council of Senior Scholars belong to the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Jihad Organisation. Khatib is fac­ing imprisonment for publishing articles critical of al-Azhar.

For Rifaat al-Said from the Na­tional Progressive Unionist Party, “al-Azhar’s problem is that it got used to extremist thinking which produces only extremists… and that causes al-Azhar to regress even further.”

“Al-Azhar has a difficult and complex structure,” he said. “The grand imam is an open-minded person but he is in charge of a curriculum in which some courses are extremist, which, of course, will produce similar thinking. He also heads the Council of Senior Scholars, which must be restruc­tured to bring in enlightened personalities and which must abandon the frozen mindsets controlling it.”

Al-Azhar continues to resist calls for reform. Some conserva­tive religious figures are trying to turn it into a Vatican for Muslims. “Extremists are explaining those calls for reforming al-Azhar and presenting them to Muslims as part of a colonialist scheme to de­stroy Islam. This is why they are staunchly resisting them,” said Amine Shelby from the Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs.

One of the severest critics of al-Azhar is Member of Parlia­ment Mohamed Abou Hamed. He introduced a bill that directly threatens Tayeb’s position. “Both Salafist and Muslim Brotherhood ideologies exist inside al-Azhar and nobody can deny that fact. This represents a real handicap on the path to reform,” Abou Hamed has said.

“There are leading administra­tive and teaching figures who espouse delinquent ideas. Even the Council of Senior Scholars includes Brotherhood figures and this despite the law which clas­sifies the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organisation. In its current composition, the council is breaking the law.”

Still, Abou Hamed’s bill was withdrawn.

The battle for al-Azhar has regional reverberations. Some powerful countries in the region are carefully monitoring the con­flict. The “Arab spring” brought the issues of the role of religion in society and of who has the author­ity to determine that role to the forefront.

Some Arab regimes that had welcomed the removal of the Mus­lim Brotherhood from power are concerned about al-Azhar turn­ing into a force confronting the secular governmental system in Egypt. Others are apprehensive of the influence of the controversial scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who is an al-Azhar alumnus whose ideas have become a staple of Brother­hood ideology.

Many Arab officials are aware of the influence of al-Azhar Univer­sity not only in the Arab world but also in the wider Muslim world and especially among the Muslim minorities in Europe and else­where. Hundreds of thousands of Muslim students travel to al-Azhar to study religion.

Some Egyptian diplomats fear that the conflict between the government and al-Azhar may be turned into an attack on Islam. They say that Sisi must tread very carefully and handle reforming al-Azhar with patience. After all, it took the Muslim extremists dec­ades to infiltrate al-Azhar; it might very well take decades more to dislodge them.


Ahmed Abou Douh is an Egyptian writer.


As Printed
MENA Now
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Dalal Saoud

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editors: Jonathan Hemming and Richard Pretorius

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

Opinion Section Editor: Claude Salhani

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Levant Section Editor: Jamal J. Halaby

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Senior Correspondents:

Mahmud el-Shafey (London)

Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Correspondents

Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobeidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Rasha Elass - Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

www.alarab.co.uk

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved