The Kurds are redrawing the region’s map

An independent Kurdish state is no easy matter but at the same time the reasons given by Abadi for refusing secession are also baseless and unrealistic.


2017/10/01 Issue: 125 Page: 6


The Arab Weekly
Khairallah Khairallah



The Kurds had their independence refer­endum. Granted, it was a historic moment in the Middle East but it doesn’t mean that the independent Kurdish state will see the light any time soon. The road ahead is very difficult, if not impossible.

However, I guess the Kurds thought the referendum would give them leverage in their negotiations with the central government in Baghdad, assuming there is someone in Baghdad who wants to negotiate with them.

Before the referendum, it was difficult to imagine that Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) President Masoud Barzani could withstand the pressure exerted on him to delay the referendum but withstand he did, even though he had to make concessions regard­ing the thorny case of Kirkuk.

Barzani insisted that the referendum “was the first step for a people longing for independ­ence” and had nothing to do with fixing the borders of the Kurdish state but where would Kirkuk be if Kurdistan becomes a state?

Looking at the parties that exerted tremendous pressure on Barzani to have delay the referen­dum, we realise how difficult it must have been for the Kurdish president to maintain the referen­dum date.

Turkey’s opposition to the referendum cannot be ignored, especially when Ankara explicitly called the referendum a threat to its national security. The pressure from Iran must have been tough to resist, as it implicitly signalled the danger of a confrontation between Iran-backed militias of the Popular Mobilisation Forces and Kurdish peshmerga.

The most difficult opposition to ignore, however, must have been the US administration’s. The United States must have had a hand in getting the UN Security Council to condemn the Kurdish referendum but the Trump administration lacks a clear strategy for the Middle East.

Barzani could have chosen to bide his time and wait for the opportune moment to push for Kurdish independence but he didn’t. He really had no choice but to go ahead with the referendum. For one, backing away from the referendum would have spelled political suicide for him person­ally and his entire clan. Second, it wasn’t clear whether there would be another chance for such a referendum, for which Barzani had meticulously set the stage.

Three days before the referen­dum, Barzani spoke in Erbil and insisted there would be no backing away from the referendum. He demonstrated a great deal of logic, persistence and coherence with his position despite concealing the many shortcomings in his pro­gramme and the thorny question of Kirkuk in particular.

Barzani made a strong argument in favour of the referendum. He pointed out that none of the parties opposed to the referendum had given a logical reason for delaying it. He raised many pointed questions. For example, if the referendum were delayed, should the Kurds wait for new developments to ask for their independence again? What are those new developments that would make it possible for regional and global powers to agree to a referendum in Kurdis­tan? Can anyone offer a new date for the referendum?

The simple truth of the matter is that, in the current Iraqi context, the opponents of the referendum had no alternative to offer the Kurds, other than calling for the delay of the referendum. Worse, some parties advanced Iraq’s unity as an argument in favour of the delay, knowing that this so-called unity has become a joke. For all practical purposes, Iraq crumbled the day the US forces in effect handed it on a silver platter to Iran. If anything, that experience showed that Iraqi-style power sharing is a doomed experiment.

In post-2003 Iraq, sectarian militias backed by Iran gradually took control of a much-weakened state. These militias mutated into the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF) and, for all practical purposes, have replaced the Iraqi military. The venerable Iraqi Army has no future as long as the PMF is in control, just like the case of the Iranian Army and the omnipotent Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps in Iran.

The Kurds, of course, could not find their place in the religious regime placed in Iraq by Iran, just like they could not find a place under the Ba’ath regime of Saddam Hussein. Although there are occasional signs of resistance to Iranian hegemony from Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, Muqtada al-Sadr or Ammar al-Hakim, the end of the tunnel in Iraq is receding rather than approaching.

In the end, the Kurds had no choice but to move forward with their dream of independence. Given the aftershocks of the devastating political earthquake caused by the George W. Bush administration in Iraq, the Kurds weren’t sure they would ever have an independent state.

The Kurds are not only creating a new reality in Iraq, they are forcefully redrawing the region’s political map. An independent Kurdish state is no easy matter but at the same time the reasons given by Abadi for refusing secession are also baseless and unrealistic. Ironically, Abadi spoke of corrup­tion in Kurdistan but conveniently forgot the festering corruption in Iraq.

In truth, the problem is that neither Abadi nor Nuri al-Maliki before him could come up with a convincing blueprint for a confederate state in Iraq. If it is accepted that the Kurdistan region’s experiment failed, that failure is nothing compared to the humongous failure called post- 2003 Iraq.


Khairallah Khairallah is a Lebanese writer.


As Printed
MENA Now
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Regular Columnists

Claude Salhani

Yavuz Baydar

Correspondents

Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi

Designers

Ibrahim Ben Bechir

Hanen Jebali

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

www.alarab.co.uk

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved