Kurdistan’s secession from Iraq is not a done deal

For Iraqi Kurdistan to succeed as an independent state, the guarantors of state security cannot be beholden to two political families.


2017/10/15 Issue: 127 Page: 11


The Arab Weekly
James Snell



Iraq’s Kurds have voted overwhelmingly to become in­dependent. More than 90% of those who voted backed seces­sion. This confident margin of victory does not translate into international confidence. The United States repeatedly attempted to dissuade the leaders of the Kurd­ish Regional Government (KRG) from having the referendum at all.

The government of Iraq did not look kindly on talk of independence and attempted, mainly by issuing threats, to prevent the referendum from taking place. Once the vote was completed, Iraq’s leaders hard­ened their position.

Other regional powers also lined up to condemn the possibility of secession. In this, Iran and Turkey are looking not only outward, but inward, assessing that their own Kurdish minorities may be embold­ened by the Iraqi vote.

Despite the rhetoric of KRG President Masoud Barzani and others, Iraqi Kurdish politicians are cautious. Independence is not a done deal.

Michael Knights, a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said: “De jure independ­ence — meaning Iraqi Kurdistan as a UN-recognised state — is not inevi­table.” Instead, Knights suggested, other options remain. Iraqi Kurdis­tan could end up “a stronger federal autonomous region inside Iraq” or the Iraqi state could embrace “co-federalism.”

These outcomes are not popu­lar. They are options that require dialogue and conciliation after a campaign that strained relations be­tween the Kurds and Iraq’s Baghdad government.

The Iraqi state has taken a hard line on the possibility of Kurdish independence and has done so in concert with neighbouring coun­tries. It has closed Kurdish airspace to outside travel, shutting down flights linking Erbil to the wider world.

Under a Notice to Airmen, a tool used by governments to restrict flights, Kurdish airspace could remain closed until December 29. This could prove an effective pun­ishment from Baghdad and a real obstacle to Kurdish independence.

Other countries were content to work in tandem with the national Iraqi government to make full inde­pendence less likely. Knights said: “Turkey is following Baghdad’s lead at present and there is a desire in Ankara to teach the Kurds a lesson and show Baghdad that Turkey is a partner in restraining a move to full independence.”

Punitive measures such as this dampen the tone in the KRG, which faces financial and governmental crises.

Abdulla Hawez, a researcher at King’s College London who looks at Kurdish politics and society, said that, despite the massive elec­toral victory for the independence campaign: “I think the majority of Kurds are actually pessimistic. There were already a large number of Kurds who were not happy with the timing of the independence [vote] and thought it is a politically driven decision by Barzani to stay in power.”

He said there are threats from Baghdad and other countries that have “imposed sanctions on KRG without Barzani being able to do much; increasingly a number of people are questioning whether the timing of the referendum was right and whether Barzani has an actual plan to go further with his inde­pendence project.”

Hawez noted that “there are many complexities.”

The practical business of seces­sion is made more difficult by the problems that need to be resolved if Iraqi Kurdistan is to become independent. These include the continuing fight against the Islamic State (ISIS); the status of Kurdish-occupied areas, such as Kirkuk province, which have Arab majori­ties but are not officially incorpo­rated into the KRG; and economic issues.

The status of Kurdistan’s natural resources is vital. If an independent Kurdistan could not control them, it would be unable to function. Hawez said “the economy is almost all dependent on oil and gas.”

Making use of these resources is essential. Hawez noted that given the fact that Kurdistan is land­locked, “the region needs to have the approval of at least one of the neighbouring countries (e.g. Tur­key) to be able to export its natural resources thus to economically survive.” With Ankara aping Iraq’s national government in denouncing the referendum and the prospect of independence, this result seems unlikely.

Independence is also hampered by political dysfunction within Iraqi Kurdistan. As Hawez noted: “Kurdistan doesn’t have any actual functioning institutions.”

“For instance, the KDP [Barzani’s Kurdistan Democratic Party] was easily able to unilaterally close the parliament in 2014 when the legislators tried to discuss a new bill to change Kurdistan’s [presidential] law and eventually topple Barzani,” he said.

This is exacerbated by institution­al problems within the military and police. Hawez said: “The security forces are not only partisan but loyal to the Barzani and Talabani ruling families.”

For Iraqi Kurdistan to succeed as an independent state, the guaran­tors of state security cannot be beholden to two political families.

An independent Kurdistan would face many challenges. Even to secede, its leaders would need to find, with Iraq and other neighbour­ing countries, solutions to almost intractable problems. None of this looks likely. The atmosphere inter­nationally is hardly positive. This is beginning to sour the mood within the KRG.

Successfully carrying out and winning the referendum was the easy part for Barzani and other Kurdish politicians. Independence may prove unworkably difficult, involving economic hardship, po­litical isolation and internal crisis if Iraqi Kurdistan achieves independ­ence at all.


James Snell is a British journalist.


As Printed
MENA Now
Editors' Picks

The Arab Weekly Newspaper reaches Western & Arabic audience that are influential as well as being affluent.

From Europe to the Middle East,and North America, The Arab Weekly talks to opinion formers and influential figures, providing insight and comment on national, international and regional news through the focus of Arabic countries and community.

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Publisher and Group Executive Editor: Haitham El-Zobaidi, PhD

Editor-in-Chief: Oussama Romdhani

Managing Editor: Iman Zayat

Deputy Managing Editor and Online Editor: Mamoon Alabbasi

Senior Editor: John Hendel

Chief Copy Editor: Richard Pretorius

Copy Editor: Stephen Quillen

Analysis Section Editor: Ed Blanche

East/West Section Editor: Mark Habeeb

Gulf Section Editor: Mohammed Alkhereiji

Society and Travel Sections Editor: Samar Kadi

Syria and Lebanon Sections Editor: Simon Speakman Cordall

Contributing Editor: Rashmee Roshan Lall

Senior Correspondents: Mahmud el-Shafey (London) & Lamine Ghanmi (Tunis)

Regular Columnists

Claude Salhani

Yavuz Baydar

Correspondents

Saad Guerraoui (Casablanca)

Dunia El-Zobaidi (London)

Roua Khlifi (Tunis)

Thomas Seibert (Washington)

Chief Designer: Marwen Hmedi

Designers

Ibrahim Ben Bechir

Hanen Jebali

Published by Al Arab Publishing House

Contact editor at:editor@thearabweekly.com

Subscription & Advertising: Ads@alarab.co.uk

Tel 020 3667 7249

Mohamed Al Mufti

Marketing & Advertising Manager

Tel (Main) +44 20 6702 3999

Direct: +44 20 8742 9262

www.alarab.co.uk

Al Arab Publishing House

Kensington Centre

177-179 Hammersmith Road

London W6 8BS , UK

Tel: (+44) 20 7602 3999

Fax: (+44) 20 7602 8778

Follow Us
© The Arab Weekly, All rights reserved